Let's Talk RAP & Common Law
Executive Summary – Restore America Plan intends to return the USA to common law. This is lawful law and order according to the constitution. They usurp your rights under their stupid de facto system. Since we expect the de facto system to come to an end shortly we will focus on common law rather than tediously go through explaining what is wrong with the existing de facto legal system. Once common law is restored the de facto system will be moot and forgotten just like the criminals operating under color of government. Here we are going to cover some definitions as a starting point. It can be very useful to understand common law in the coming weeks.
De Jure – This is a term we use to mean lawful. Common law in the republic is lawful
De Facto – This term basically means what it is there now, the system being applied at present. The de facto system may not be lawful but it could be lawful. De jeur could be de facto and soon will be,but now it is not.
Sovereign – A flesh and blood person, you know one with a pulse. Corporations are unnatural persons and have no pulse. A sovereign can own property (chattels). Without sovereigns there is no government.
Citizens – These are not sovereigns. They are subjects. Not a free man or free woman. This is a fiction fraud the de facto government created to unwillingly turn sovereigns into subjects of the illegal federal corporation or in turn one of the state corporations. The de facto government designates the names of its citizens in all capital letters which is a meaning used under their rules to designate a corporation. They basically have created an artificial person (corporation) for you which sovereigns refer to as the strawman. When you agree to being a citizen by signing off on the de facto documents as such you are turning yourself into some sort of an indentured servant. This of course is fraudulent and illegal since there was no disclosure at all, let alone full disclosure. You cannot be a sovereign citizen. You want to be a sovereign only.
Corporation – This is an artificial person, unnatural person or judicial person. It is a legal fiction, not real. A corporation exists only on papers issued by the de factor government. A corporation is designated by using all capital letters. They do this with citizen names, thus they turn citizens unto corporations and thus under the federal corporation jurisdiction since that is what created the strawman. You are not the strawman. The strawman is a fiction they created to enslave you. Silly stupid rules they have created thinking they will fool “we the people” forever and also make things legal so as to avoid prosecution someday if they get exposed. Time and time again we say the following. The internet was their undoing since it allowed for the spread of information not censored or controlled by the mainstream media, publishing houses etc.
Common Law – Constitutional law. Read the federalist papers. This is God's law not the banksters version of law.
Admiralty Law or Maritime Law – This was the law designed for the high seas. It can also be applied to a foreign ship loading or loading at a domesticate port. It has been abused by the de facto courts illegally. It has no constitutional provisions or protections since it is designed as an international law. A ship off loading at port may say drop something on a car and ruin the car. The admiralty law through the use of an admiralty lien can enable one to obtain swift justice/compensation for their damages before the foreign ship sails away never to be seen again. To operate the de facto courts like an admiralty court is simply nonsense but it served them as a vehicle to operate courts that looked like real courts but were ignoring the constitution. When you cross that little wooden gate into the area where the judge, clerk, bailiff, prosecutor, members of the bar are it is as if you were boarding a ship and thus the maritime law. The flags they fly have the gold fringe around the edge designating military court thus again no constitution since military law is not under the constitution. So they created some stupid charades to do away with the constitution in what they thought was a lawful manner. Again lacking full disclosure is just a fraud, plain and simple.
"Pursuant to U.S.C. Chapter 1, 2, and 3; Executive Order No. 10834, August 21, 1959, 24 F.R. 6865, a military flag is a flag that resembles the regular flag of the United States, except that it has a YELLOW FRINGE, bordered on three sides. The President of the United states designates this deviation from the regular flag, by executive order, and in his capacity as COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF of the Armed forces."
"Pursuant to the "Law of the Flag", a military flag does result in jurisdictional implication when flown. The Plaintiff cites the following: "Under what is called international law, the law of the flag, a shipowner who sends his vessel into a foreign port gives notice by his flag to all who enter into contracts with the shipmaster that he intends the law of the flag to regulate those contracts with the shipmaster that he either submit to its operation or not contract with him or his agent at all." - Ruhstrat v. People, 57 N.E. 41, 45, 185 ILL. 133, 49 LRA 181, 76 AM.
The de facto government has thus been operating under military rule for over one century. Idiots.
Common Law Judge – This describes a real common law court not the garbage de facto courts you see today. The judge presides over the proceedings in the court to maintain order. He ensures order. Both parties cannot speak at the same time. He makes sure the court reporter can hear and get everything recorded. He prevents people from screaming, cursing, throwing things and other immature outbursts. He lets the proceedings proceed according to order. He swears the jury and witnesses in BUT there is no asking for them to swear and violate the bible prohibitions against this. The people will affirm they will tell the truth and nothing but the truth. He would issue the official finding of the court into a record. The judge will not over ride, cancel, nullify or in any way undermine or interfere with any decision the jury arrives at. He has no such right. The judge will not be a member of the bar. That is correct. Judges will be people knowledgeable about common law but they may have not gone to law school. Common law is easy. Let's go next to the BAR.
The Bar Association – Lawyers have a title of nobility – esquire. This is illegal under the constitution. The BAR ties a loyalty to the crown of England. This will all be gone. No one holding a title of nobility like esquire will be appearing in any legitimate common law courts. Lawyers will need to renounce their titles and membership in the bar. The BAR will become an illegal organization. Non lawyers will be able to represent clients as counselors of law just like one who went to law school but didn't attend law school. No requirement to having attended law school either.
Lawyers – Lawyers will actually be at a disadvantage in a common law court. Their head is full of nonsense and garbage. Most of what lawyers study is procedural. This is how they keep regular people out of the court system or crush them using the court system. You don't know which papers to file, how to get service, what the deadlines are, where to file, how many copies, how to space the typing, what comes next, etc. All idiotic. Under common law and the constitution you will have a right to get witnesses and the court will see to it that this right of getting witnesses into the court for you is fulfilled. The court will help you get your case in front of it. How about that, no lawyer needed.
BAR Lawyers & Conflict of Interest - Lawyers have an obligation to the Bar association which has the right to investigate them and cancel or suspend their license to practice law. In a real court system there is no bar member present. This extraneous party loyal to the crown is absent, thus fair proceedings can progress ahead. Lawyers are also officers of the court now in the de facto system. This enables them to keep the proceedings crooked as a dogs hind leg since the lawyers report to the judge. The judge is referred to as the presiding officer. See they have their own weird language and rules. What is a deponent, litigant, ex parte proceeding, pro se, etc? This is to thwart and bewilder a lay person trying to use the courts. A pro se or pro per litigant (one representing himself) statistically has better odds of racing in the Indy 500 with a blood alcohol of 3.5 than winning in a de facto court. So the lawyers have first and foremost an obligation to the bar association who controls their ability to earn a living through law license revocation. Next they have an obligation to these idiotic admiralty/maritime courts and judges since they are an officer of such courts. If the judge files a complaint against a lawyer, the bar will more than likely take swift and punitive action before the lawyer can create more damage to their sick system of injustice.
Rest assured all these lawyers understand much if not all of what is being said in this section on lawyers. They probably do not know that the courts are admiralty or maritime unless they have studied as a specialty this form of law and then they should recognize it. So the concept of lawyers as we know it will be thrown out. Yeah! It was never there in the first place. It is only another perversion of justice.
Can a Former Member of the BAR Represent You in Common Law Court – Sure. Think again if you want this. These are fair courts. These lawyers mostly won cases in a few ways. One is to run the legal bills up so high the other side settles or defaults to avoid paying such high legal bills. Well in the Common Law courts representation can be cheap – yourself. You will not need to hire a lawyer but for many it will make sense to get a legal counsellor. Since they are not going to have to go to law school for years, they will not be so expensive. The legal tricks to run up bills now like with discovery battles, summary judgments, amending complaints constantly, excessive witness depositions and re-deposing of witnesses, emergency arbitration conferences etc etc etc will be gone. The cases will go forth nice and direct. The files will not get 15 feet high in civil damage cases like now. These idiots use hand dollies to bring their cases into the courtroom, really they do. Absurd. If a judge really wants to understand a case he has his clerks throw out 90% of the filings and give him the meat to read.
Lawyers fight with dirty tactics that will not be allowed in the common law system. Exclusion of evidence for technical silly reasons. Bifurcating cases – splitting issues into different cases to postpone decisions, run up legal bills etc. John Doe subpoenas and complaints. They sue Does 1-99 in court. Now they have a case against someone who has not been defined and not served. Really they do this. Ok then they start issuing subpoenas for bank records, phone records, internet records etc of witnesses and people they suspect may have some information about who these does 1-99 culprits are and what they did. This really goes on. There is no other side to protest the subpoenas. The banks etc do not bother telling the account holder since it costs them money to fight a subpoena so they do not even tell the account holder. If the account holder knows he may fight the subpoena and then the bank needs active counsel to protect their interests. So now privacy is violated for no valid reason. See the garbage they pull. This is procedures, not law. They learn how to pull stunts to thwart justice. Today tell it to a judge and he says well the attorney followed the rules of the court. Try this nonsense with a de jeur grand jury unfettered by a judge and prosecutor and there is going to be consequences, money and possible criminal damages if they could even pull it off which is most doubtful under common law since such subpoena requests will be seriously monitored by other than an alcoholic judge on the golf course.
Lawyers want to bill you to death. The need for them will be diminished. Competition amongst law counsellors will be keen. The old ex-bar lawyers will lose interest in the profession in that it will never be like it was. They do not know real law. Perry Mason is as real as Rambo. They know procedures and how to use procedures to take advantage of people – they get their clients ($) and the adversary of their client. A real lawyer fighting for his client only, cannot really function correctly in the de facto courts no matter ho hard he wants to try to do so. A new era is what this will be.
Suing in a Common Law Court – You can sue the biggest and baddest corporation in your county court. You can appear before the grand jury in your county or state and get a presentment going to right any wrongs they have done. The multi-billion dollar corporations will be equal to you in court. Imagine that. This is the way it is supposed to be. They will not be able to hide behind a 900 member law firm who will paper you to death. These lawyers now contribute to the judges election funds. Sick. Judges will have so very little power to sway a jury decision under common law it would be stupid to corrupt them plus remember no more BAR so the financial incentive is removed. Law is not going to be a big money profession. If these big guys try to run you out of business ok grand jury presentment. There are a lot of people who studied the Federalist Papers, The Constitution and the Magna Carta plus the Bible who know common law and well at that. They know the decisions of the Supreme Court and federal courts way back when before it was corrupted. I need to add that case law will not be used in common law. Under case law the same actions can be right and wrong at the same time since judges have had varying opinions. It will serve to confuse not illuminate, but the old cases are useful for learning common law principles. I have heard some of these people speak. Lawyers trained in procedural skullduggery are no match for these self taught law counselors. Remember no hiding behind procedures.
You can get the big corporation controlling executives on criminal charges and civil damages by presenting your case to a jury of your peers without a drunk corrupt judge steering the ship (pun intended maritime courts). Under common law you can bring a party to court that has damaged you or your property. These big corporations will go through quite an adjustment period and they may lose a lot of cases if they do not mend their evil ways. It will take them time to even figure out what they can and cannot do. Their lawyers are so steeped into deception and perverting justice they will get confused. How do you walk into a client who pays you $625 an hour and say well anytime you cause any damage to a person they can take you to the grand jury and bring you up or sue you in a common law court. Gee we can no longer play our games in these courts. No they do not even need a lawyer anymore. You see the rules of the de facto courts were put in place to protect the rich as they exploit you through their corporations and banks. Now their armor is removed and they are sitting there all exposed judicially. A lot of existing cases are going to be dropped. A lot of executives are going to be retiring and leaving the land with their wealth before they get involved in a case. A fair and honest court system where you are on equal ground with them is scary to them. They are a target with all their wealth and evil deeds. BUT the de jeur grand juries will not be biased or prejudicial because one has not a lot of wealth and the same thing applies to the poor. This will scare the elite out of the land. Let them go.
Criminal Cases – You will be able to get criminal justice against anyone who has harmed you. Any sort of harm will qualify. You will have access to the grand jury without need of a lawyer or the government prosecutor. You will be able to bring charges against an abusive law enforcement officer, judge, or government official who violates the law. They will not have immunity. They need to fulfill their oath of office and there is no immunity against such violations.They can be plucked out of office by the grand jury through the enforcement arm of the marshall. Idiotic police tasering, badgering, threatening, illegal searches and seizures, etc by law enforcement will be over as it should be. There will be police going to jail and getting civil penalties, losing their jobs etc until they get the idea of protecting and serving. Like the Los Angeles police cars say – Protect and Serve, not terrorize and abuse. The police need reeducating is all. The few that fail to stop being thugs will run into the new system and get corrected. You will not need to convince a government prosector of a crime to get in front of a grand jury. You can do this without them.The judge will have no effect on the outcome of the grand jury which is composed of your peers. Thus county by county grand juries. Any type of harm another causes you is punishable. Crimes without natural person victims are not crimes. Violating a government statue without a real victim is not a crime. Thus no more speeding tickets, illegal turn tickets, CCW violations, drug violations, failure to get this license or permit, failure to have car insurance, no debtors prison etc. There will still be fraud, embezzlement, slander, defamation, forgery, robbery, theft, rape, assault, kidnapping and things like that. Selling real estate without a license is not a crime. Lying or committing fraud regarding the real estate sale can be a crime. Any type of physical harm on another will be dealt with harshly. There will be prisons. Driver licenses for private parties will be eliminated, just commercial driving licenses.
Appellate Courts - There could be an instance where there is a runaway grand jury and a runaway local court then the evils need to be corrected in an appellate court. There are different levels of appellate courts right up to the Supreme Court of the Republic of the United States. Another remedy could be arrived at by going to higher grand jury like one for the state over a county. Checks and balances will be there. So if you were traveling in a state far from yours and there was an incident and you felt the locals treated you unfairly against the constitution and common law you would have recourse and they could face serious penalties for such abuses of justice.
Future of Large Corporations – I think the day of the big corporation will be over. They are monopolies. They artificially control markets. They terrorize their competitors in courts. They abuse the patent and copyright laws voraciously. They get funds from the banksters and run their companies at zero profits until they dominate the market having run their competition out of business with price fixing and abusive business practices. Their competition are not in the ole boy network and cannot go to wall street for financing to crush their competition like they do. This is going to be fixed through the common law courts. The business model will revert to one of small to medium size companies selling American know how, ingenuity and quality. Like it used to be. Suppressed inventions will be released and many of industries that are corporate dominated now like healthcare, energy, auto etc will see revolutionary changes. Without the corrupt banksters, courts and government the large corporations will not be able to dominate against these changes and many of them will become irrelevant in the new competitive and fair market. The executives of these large corporations are idiots by and large. They get ahead by lying cheating and stealing. Look at what they have done to industry in the country. They will fail to adapt. The good ole boy system does not work in a constitutional common law country.
No comments:
Post a Comment